Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as a screen to the process that is scientific

Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as a screen to the process that is scientific

Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as a screen to the process that is scientific

Current Remarks

  • Professor Dr. Mohammad Tariqur Rahman on Happy birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Regret on Delighted birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Lee Rudolph on Drug scientists trip up, raising meth paper to compose one on LSD

We’re on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine

Nine years back this Saturday that is coming August 3, 2010, we published a post, “Why write a web log about retractions?”

Exactly just What is now clear into the intervening nine years is exactly what a vein that is rich are as stories of what goes on whenever one do my essay thing goes incorrect in technology. So that as we now have done each year at the moment, we’ll review just just just what took place within the last one year.

Share this:

Drug researchers trip up, raising meth paper to compose one on LSD

Evidently meth is really a gateway medication … for publishing misconduct.

Scientists in Asia have actually lost a 2019 paper as to how LSD may damage vision because they’d lifted most of the paper from a write-up which had showed up the entire year before in a unique log — about methamphetamine.

The article that is retracted “Long-term systemic therapy with lysergic acid diethylamide causes retinal harm in CD1 mice,” starred in Human & Experimental Toxicology. Based on the article:

Share this:

Writers object as “doubtful” information doom dermatology paper

A dermatology log has retracted a 2017 article by a couple of scientists in Saudi Arabia after getting a complaint that is“serious about the integrity for the information. Nevertheless the very first writer of the paper pressed straight right right back, saying the move ended up being unjustified.

The content, “Successful usage of blended corticosteroids and rituximab in someone with refractory cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa,” had been compiled by Ibrahim Al-Homood and Mohammad Aljahlan, rheumatologists at King Fahad health City in Riyadh and starred in the Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic operation. It described (with instead grisly photos) the scenario of the man that is 25-year-old serious leg ulcers that fixed after the described combination treatment.

But in the notice describes, the paper can’t be trusted:

Share this:

Kyoto University suspends very first writer of retracted Kumamoto quake paper

The initial composer of a now-retracted paper in Science in regards to the results of the deadly 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan happens to be suspended from their college place for starters 12 months.

Intending Lin, regarding the Department of Geophysics at Kyoto University, ended up being sanctioned by the organization for misconduct stemming from their abuse of data and plagiarism within the 2016 paper:

Share this:

Sunday checks out: A sleuth whoever work has resulted in a huge selection of retractions and modifications; an “unethical, high-risk and misleading eye that is; genetics’ high retraction price

Before we provide this week’s sunday Reads, a concern: Do you realy enjoy our weekly roundup? If that’s the case, we’re able to actually make use of your assistance. Can you think about a tax-deductible contribution to support sunday Reads, and our everyday work? Many Many Thanks ahead of time.

Share this:

Forensics Friday: could you flag this paper if it had been under review?

Ever wished to hone your talent as a systematic sleuth? Now’s your opportunity.

Due to the United states Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB), which will be focused on educating writers on guidelines in publishing, figure preparation, and reproducibility, we’re presenting the tenth in a string, Forensics Friday.

Take a good look at the image below, and then simply just just take our poll. From then on, click the link below to find out the right response.

Share this:

Cock and bull tale results in retraction of bovine herpesvirus paper

The ancients possessed thing for hybrids (think animals, maybe perhaps not vehicles): half goat-half people, horses with human being torsos, winged horses and lions, you obtain the image. But a chicken-cow mix wasn’t on that list … until now.

A small grouping of scientists in Brazil has lost a paper in a journal that is veterinary attempting to reuse information from the chicken study inside their paper on herpesvirus infections in cattle.

This article, “Bovine Herpesvirus 5 promotes mitochondrial disorder in cultured bovine monocyte-derived macrophages and never influence virus replication,” starred in February within the journal Veterinary Microbiology.

Share this:

‘Not biologically plausible’: questions about survey information earn fluorosis paper a banner

A article that is recent provided a stark caution concerning the dangers to young ones of fluoride into the nation’s water happens to be tagged with a manifestation of concern following the book of a fresh paper which undermines the reliability associated with the initial information.

This article, “Dental fluorosis trends in US dental health studies: 1986 to 2012,” starred in March in JDR Clinical & Translational analysis, a journal that is dental. The very first writer on the paper is Christopher Neurath, for the United states Environmental wellness research Project, which advocates against fluoridation of water.

This article, that used information through the nationwide health insurance and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) when it comes to years 2011 and 2012, reported “large increases in extent and prevalence” of fluorosis over that period — continuing a trend dating back to to the mid-1980s.

Based on the scientists:

Share this:

Gravitational industries, silkworm excrement, and “putor” programs: exactly exactly exactly How did this “pure, utter nonsense” get into in a journal that is peer-reviewed?

Often, a paper arrives this is certainly therefore revolutionary, it defies description. Therefore as opposed to attempt to do justice to a paper that is recent Parasitology Research, we’ll replicate a few paragraphs right right here:

Share this:

Leech paper nets phrase of concern

A write-up claiming to uproot the evolutionary tree of leeches has gotten a manifestation of concern following an audience notified the journal about possible issues with the information.

The content, “Phylogenomic analysis of the putative link that is missing reinterpretation of leech development,” appeared online in Genome Biology and Evolution, an Oxford University Press name, on June 19 of the 12 months. In line with the writers — a team that is international includes scientists during the National Museum of Natural History, the new york Museum of Natural Sciences, Florida State University and University of Gothenburg in Sweden — their results: